The country's leading opinion daily
NOTES
Marvin
P. Bionat
5 September 1998
Pseudo-Hagglers
Marvin Cortez (Harvard College 95), a good friend here in Boston, is disposing of his furniture and appliances before he leaves Massachusetts to attend the University of Chicagos Graduate School of Business. Having sliced green mango (dipped in--or dug into--Kamayans original ginisang bagoong) over Sam Adams together on numerous occasions, he offers me a couple of freebies (including a desk chair on which I now sit). But that darn TV cost him $180, and since hell be unemployed in the next two years and will be living off a student loan, he thinks he should sell it for what its now worth. (That Admiral place in Chicago will cost him money.) Im given first priority--like there is a waiting list for people wanting to have a second TV. Since washing dishes (not to mention frying dilis) often fails to bring my angst or boredom to a comfortable level, I express interest in buying a second set for my dingy little kitchen.
Like a true consumer, I ask him for the price. He confesses that he is not sure how much a TV set depreciates after about a year of use. One morning, he sends me an e-mail:
Hey Marvin:
My business-school mindset inspired me to come up with a depreciation formula for the TV. I bought it for $180 one year ago. TVs have a life span ranging from about 5 to 15 years, so I expect the average TV to last 10 years; meaning that for each year of usage, it would depreciate by approximately 10 percent. However, it would depreciate the most during the first year of use, but certainly not as much as automobiles.
Moreover, the depreciation would depend on the daily usage of the TV, the average being 2 hours a day, totaling 730 hours per year. Since I only used the TV a total of 500 hours this year, this offsets the increased depreciation during the first year of use. Using these factors along with the fact that you're a Filipino and a good friend of mine, I have derived the following formula:
Original cost - depreciation - Filipino factor - friend factor - transaction costs = selling price; where depreciation =.1 x cost, Filipino factor = .06 x cost, friend factor = .02 x cost, transaction costs = .04 x cost.
If you think the Filipino and friend factors are too low, then consider that we are in the US where these factors are not as important in business transactions. Substituting real numbers produces the following results:
$180 - .1(180) - .06 (180) - .02(180) - .04 (180) = 180 - 18 - 10.80 - 3.60 - 7.20 = $140.40
My reply:
I think I can use this material for my next ISYU column, which entitles you to $5 for intellectual property rights. Then I suppose you'll deliver, which could be another $10. That's a running total of $155. On the other hand, Sears has a different formula for depreciation. In general, TV sets depreciate up to 40 percent in a year or two. (That's $108 + the $15 for rights and delivery or only $123.) Another important factor is demand--I have an existing one and am not actively in search for a new set, so real value won't really attract me. It will require a "promotional sales discount" of at least 10 percent to call my attention. (Rounding off, that's down to $110.) As you said, there are the "Filipino" and "friend" factors which--anywhere in the world--I have boldly and arbitrarily set at around $50 for TV sets (partly on account of Ninoy Aquino's statement that "Filipinos are worth dying for."). (That's $70.) With my low price of $70 dollars and your $140--the grand Philippine tradition of street hawking (e.g., Baclaran and the Cubao Farmers Market area) requires us to consider if we can settle in the middle: $105.
His reply:
Regarding the Sears formula for depreciation, you must note that it is in their best interest to provide high depreciation costs since it encourages you to buy newer TV sets every year and, thus, contribute to their profit margins. Therefore, I would consider their formula to be invalid and infinitely inferior to the formula which I derived.
Regarding Ninoy's statement, I believe he had an abstract meaning in mind, akin to my own mindset. He probably loved the concept of "Filipinoness" much more than he did individual Filipinos. And since I'm selling it to an individual Filipino rather than to the abstract concept of Filipinoness, I would say his statement is worth at most a discount of $5.
Furthermore, regarding the grand tradition of street hawking, you have to remember that I was trained in the rough-and-tumble markets of Pangasinan. If you didn't already know, we are known to be more kuripot (tightfisted) than Ilokanos. Given this, I should be able to extract at least 15 percent more than the actual costs from any business transaction. However, I'll grant that you're also Filipino and also quite frugal, which entitles you to get a 5 percent discount from actual costs. Advantage mine: +10 percent.
Regarding demand for TV sets, I'll concede that your demand is lower than the average customer's, entitling you to some bargaining power. However, as you already mentioned, in business transactions between Filipinos, you also have to account for the Filipinoness, bayanihan (sense of community), and friendship factors. This means that your purchase of the TV is determined not only by supply and demand factors, but also by the desire for pakikisama (smooth interpersonal relations) and utang na loob (gratitude). In other words, cronyism.
My reply:
This is funnier than I expected ... Now, if I can just end it with a socially redeeming thought or idea, I'm all set for my next ISYU deadline.
His reply:
I think it speaks for itself. My ("American") roommates are always speaking on these terms, to make sure everything is fair. In the end, if the Philippines is to become a developed and modern country, it has to start dealing with these issues. It may sound cold-hearted to put a cost on everything and put professional dealings above personal relations. But it's what the Asian countries have to do to get their economies moving again.
* * *
The following day, Marvin drops by my apartment to help me move to a new unit, just a block away. Of course, I realize that I shouldnt raise the TV price issue while he has too much bargaining power on his shoulder--especially the sleeper sofa. I wait until were done moving.
As we drink beer and eat slices of Pizzeria Unos Chicago Classic deep-dish pizza (for which Im sure he knows I intend to pay), I ask with feigned spontaneity, Oh, by the way, have you decided on the final price for the TV?
His surprising reply: Ill give it to you for $100. What a monumental disappointment that must be to all genuine, cold-hearted hustlers from the Pangasinan Public Market: one of their own, so full of promise but revealing a tendency to buckle under the influence of beer and pizza.
The following day, he delivers his TV. I write a check for $120.
I guess Im not the toughest bargainer either. My apologies to all Ilonggos.
* * *
This is a bit outdated but check it out anyway: Internet for Politicians.
* * *
Comments?
|